Peer Review Policy
The Wah Academia Journal of Health and Nutrition (WAJHN) is committed to maintaining the highest standards of scholarly publishing through a rigorous and transparent double-blind peer review process. All manuscripts submitted to WAJHN undergo the following review stages:
1. Initial Editorial Screening
-
Every submission is first screened by the editorial office to ensure compliance with the journal’s author guidelines, ethical standards, and scope.
-
Manuscripts that do not meet the journal’s basic requirements may be returned to the author before peer review.
2. Reviewer Selection
-
Each manuscript is assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers.
-
Reviewers are external to the journal’s editorial board to maintain impartiality and objectivity.
-
Selection is based on subject-matter expertise, research background, and absence of conflicts of interest.
3. Double-Blind Review Process
-
WAJHN follows a double-blind system, meaning that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous to each other.
-
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript for: originality, methodological rigor, ethical compliance, clarity of presentation, relevance, and contribution to the field of health and nutrition.
4. Reviewer Reports & Recommendations
-
Reviewers provide constructive written feedback along with one of the following recommendations:
-
Accept as is
-
Minor revisions required
-
Major revisions required
-
Reject
-
-
Authors are expected to revise their manuscripts in response to reviewer comments within the specified timeframe.
5. Editorial Decision
-
The final decision (acceptance, revision, or rejection) rests with the Editor-in-Chief or designated Associate Editor, taking into account the reviewers’ recommendations and overall manuscript quality.
-
In cases of conflicting reviews, an additional reviewer may be invited to ensure fairness.
6. Transparency & Ethics
-
WAJHN adheres to the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines for peer review.
-
Conflicts of interest must be declared by reviewers and editors.
-
Reviewers are expected to maintain confidentiality and evaluate manuscripts objectively.
7. Post-Acceptance
-
Accepted manuscripts undergo copyediting, proofreading, and formatting before publication.
-
All articles are published as open access, freely available to the global community.